Evaluation of Efficiency of Torrential Protective Structures With New BF-TOPSIS Methods

Abstract : Decision-Aid Methods (DAMs) such as the Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) help decision-makers to rank alternatives or to choose the best one among several potential ones. The new Belief Function based Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (BF-TOPSIS) methods have been recently developed for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making problems. In this paper, we compare CBA, AHP and BF-TOPSIS methods through an actual application case to natural risks in mountains. The CBA is the most used approach but is limited. Classical Multi-Criteria Decision-Aid methods (MCDAs) such as the AHP help to go further. The BF-TOPSIS methods notably show a robustness to rank reversal problems in the problem under concern, with a tractable complexity. Moreover, some steps of these new methods can be included in other MCDAs developed under the belief function theory framework.
Liste complète des métadonnées

Cited literature [26 references]  Display  Hide  Download

https://hal-emse.ccsd.cnrs.fr/emse-01353475
Contributor : Florent Breuil <>
Submitted on : Thursday, August 11, 2016 - 3:06:50 PM
Last modification on : Wednesday, April 10, 2019 - 1:24:18 AM
Document(s) archivé(s) le : Saturday, November 12, 2016 - 12:15:15 PM

File

Fusion2016-AppliMCDM-FinalVers...
Files produced by the author(s)

Identifiers

  • HAL Id : emse-01353475, version 1

Citation

Simon Carladous, Jean-Marc Tacnet, Jean Dezert, Deqiang Han, Mireille Batton-Hubert. Evaluation of Efficiency of Torrential Protective Structures With New BF-TOPSIS Methods. 19th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION 2016), Jul 2016, Heidelberg, Germany. pp.2267-2274. ⟨emse-01353475⟩

Share

Metrics

Record views

778

Files downloads

563