Evaluation of Efficiency of Torrential Protective Structures With New BF-TOPSIS Methods - Mines Saint-Étienne Access content directly
Conference Papers Year : 2016

Evaluation of Efficiency of Torrential Protective Structures With New BF-TOPSIS Methods

Abstract

Decision-Aid Methods (DAMs) such as the Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) help decision-makers to rank alternatives or to choose the best one among several potential ones. The new Belief Function based Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (BF-TOPSIS) methods have been recently developed for Multi-Criteria Decision-Making problems. In this paper, we compare CBA, AHP and BF-TOPSIS methods through an actual application case to natural risks in mountains. The CBA is the most used approach but is limited. Classical Multi-Criteria Decision-Aid methods (MCDAs) such as the AHP help to go further. The BF-TOPSIS methods notably show a robustness to rank reversal problems in the problem under concern, with a tractable complexity. Moreover, some steps of these new methods can be included in other MCDAs developed under the belief function theory framework.
Fichier principal
Vignette du fichier
Fusion2016-AppliMCDM-FinalVersion.pdf (579.9 Ko) Télécharger le fichier
Origin : Files produced by the author(s)
Loading...

Dates and versions

emse-01353475 , version 1 (11-08-2016)

Identifiers

Cite

Simon Carladous, Jean-Marc Tacnet, Jean Dezert, Deqiang Han, Mireille Batton-Hubert. Evaluation of Efficiency of Torrential Protective Structures With New BF-TOPSIS Methods. 19th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION 2016), Jul 2016, Heidelberg, Germany. pp.2267-2274. ⟨emse-01353475⟩
519 View
363 Download

Share

Gmail Facebook X LinkedIn More